1987 (11) TMI 151

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ighty Engineers Rs. 2,00,000 2. M/s. Mighty Engineers Rs. 2,00,000 3. Mrs. T.W. Fernando Rs. 20,000 4. M/s. Rajan Trading Co. Rs. 1,00,000 5. Mr. M. Imaculate Rs. 35,000 6. Mrs. Visalakshi Mayyappan Rs. 35,000 7. M/s Saghai Exporters Rs. 10,000 .   Rs. 6,00,000 However only a sum of Rs. 2,18,000 had actually been received. The income and expenditure statement of the assessee showed an of expenditure of Rs. 2,61,107. The statement of affairs is tabulated as follows: Trust Fund: As per the last statement of affairs. Rs. 15,158 Add: Receipts during the year Rs. 6,00,000   Rs. 6,15,158 Less: Excess of expenditure ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oject of constructing a hospital. According to the assessee, therefore, there was no gift at all until the funds were actually received. In the alternative, it was argued that the retention of the monies promised by the donors until actual delivery of the cash to the assessee did not amount either to a loan or a diversion or investment because there was no voluntary Act of the assessee in that regard. 5. On the other hand, the contention of the Revenue was that taking all the amounts to the credit of the assessee in the books itself constituted a gift and the provisions of s.13 were attracted as held by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Sharda Trust vs. CIT (1980) 16 CTR (P&H) 36 : (1981) 127 ITR 236 (P&H). It was submitted ....