Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1984 (8) TMI 166

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ne lakh. The ITO completed the assessment in the status of "AOP". While doing so, he rejected the contention of the assessee that the persons concerned should be assessed individually in respect of their respective winnings. 2. However, on appeal, the AAC accepted the claim of the assessee and held that the ITO was not justified in completing the assessment in the status of an "AOP". While doing ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng the lottery prize, that they cannot be treated as "Association of Persons". The reason according to the Hon'ble Tribunal is that absolutely no activity of any kind is also involved in getting the prize amount which depends wholly on the stroke of luck. There is no need for any common management except by sheer luck. The mere fact that by a stroke of fortune that one of the tickets secured the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ran & Ors., India Cement Ltd., Sankari ITA No. 1008/Mds/1978-79 and the same was decided against the Department. According to this decision of the Tribunal, the mere fact that two or more persons purchased a lottery ticket, which, by stock of luck, won the prize could not lead to the conclusion that the persons concerned associated together for carrying on a commercial activity to produce income. ....