Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1976 (4) TMI 118

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... considered together and are disposed of by this order. 2. The assessments made are in the status of the HUF. In the asst. yr. 1971-72, in making the assessment, the ITO allowed as a deduction a share of loss of Rs. 1,411 from a firm, T.M.S. Dhanushkodi Nadar and Sons. The assessee did not show the loss in the return filed on the ground that there was a partial partition. The ITO stated, that by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the AAC cancelling an order under s. 154 which in turn cancelled an order under s. 171 for the asst. yr. 1970-71. The result of decision in 1976 TTJ 1017 is that there is no order under s.171 for the asst. yr. 1970-71 and the HUF exists as such. According to the purported partition the business of the firm would have fallen to the assessee, i.e., the Karta. So, in any event, in the absence of t....