Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1976 (4) TMI 118

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of convenience both the appeals are considered together and are disposed of by this order. 2. The assessments made are in the status of the HUF. In the asst. yr. 1971-72, in making the assessment, the ITO allowed as a deduction a share of loss of Rs. 1,411 from a firm, T.M.S. Dhanushkodi Nadar and Sons. The assessee did not show the loss in the return filed on the ground that there was a parti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....presentative. We have set aside the other of the AAC cancelling an order under s. 154 which in turn cancelled an order under s. 171 for the asst. yr. 1970-71. The result of decision in 1976 TTJ 1017 is that there is no order under s.171 for the asst. yr. 1970-71 and the HUF exists as such. According to the purported partition the business of the firm would have fallen to the assessee, i.e., the Ka....