Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1984 (10) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng to the assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80. The assessee is a co-operative society which carries on the business of running a spinning mill. The Income-tax Officer stated for the assessment year 1978-79 that bonus had been paid at 11.33 per cent. This came to Rs. 3,90,819. He allowed as a deduction bonus at 8.33 per cent at Rs. 2,87,366 and disallowed the balance of Rs. 1,03,453. This disallow....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and since the mills of the assessee-company had worked at a loss, only the minimum bonus of 8.33 per cent was an admissible deduction. He, therefore, upheld the disallowance. 3. The assessee is in appeal before us and it was contended that the bonus payment in each of the years was only 8.33 per cent in terms of settlement under sec. 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act dated 15-10-1978 for the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the mills in the relevant year ". In the second year, the terms are in Tamil and are to similar effect. The additional payment was made for cordial and smooth working of the Mills due to the co-operation of labour. It was, therefore, not a payment linked with the profit but a payment out of commercial expediency which would have the effect of securing co-operation in the succeeding year also....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... promoting the business and to earn profits, the assessee can claim deduction under s. 10(2)(xv) of the Act even though there was no compelling necessity to incur such expenditure. IT is relevant to refer at this stage to the legislative history of s. 37 of the I. T. Act, 1961, which corresponds to s. 10(2)(xv) of the Act. An attempt was made in the I. T. Bill of 1961 to lay down the "necessity" o....