Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1989 (4) TMI 147

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Commissioner issued a detailed show cause notice on 15th Nov., 1985 under s. 285A (2) of the Act, to which the assessee filed a reply dt. 27th Dec., 1985, stating that Shri Ramanathan, the managing partner of the firm, passed away on 6th Sept., 1982 and he was submitting tenders for various contracts taken on behalf of the firm and concluded the said contracts signing the agreements on behalf of the firm till his death. On account of his sudden death, the other partners of the firm were left in the dark as some of the contract files were either misplaced by him after the accident which took place in Mysore contract work-spot, where concrete roofing caved in and several workers died, and were not readily available for verification of the various agreements entered into with many government, quasi-government and other private agencies for whom work was done by the firm. After a thorough search only a few papers could be traced from his personal almirah and on verification they found particulars in some cases had been furnished under s. 285A(1) in Form No. 52. The details are also given in the reply. It is further stated in the letter that their chief accountant aged about 70 years al....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....79 Rs. 7,500 1979-80 Rs. 5,000 1980-81 Rs. 2,000 1981-82 Rs. 4,000 1982-83 Rs. 2,000 (141-A) Hence these appeals. 4. According to the assessee the orders of the CIT imposing the fines were illegal and were, therefore, liable to be set aside. The learned counsel sought to submit with reference to copies of orders that right from the asst. yrs. 1976-77 to 1981-82 incomes returned were virtually eventually accepted in the assessment made and similar was the position for the asst. yr. 1982-83 also and, therefore, there could be no intention to default to file intimations under s. 285A in respect of all contracts. He referred to the large number of intimations which admittedly had been filed as referred to in the reply and this only showed that the assessee was anxious to comply with the provisions of law and defaults, even if they are considered to have occurred because the assessee is unable to prove the contrary for want of records due to subsequent death of the managing partner, should be considered to be excusable. 5. Another point urged was that the orders imposing fine suffered from a legal infirmity because penalties imposable were upto Rs. 50 per day for specific de....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Rs. 2,40,000 Form No. 52 dt. 26th Oct., 1978 sent to the ITO/CBE. Asst. yr. 1980-81: . 1. Construction of building for Palani Andavar College, Palani--Date of contract 5th April, 1979--Value Rs. 2,24,000 Form No. 52 dt. 17th April, 1979 sent to the ITO/CBE. . 2. Construction of building for Agricultural University Ladies Hostel, Coimbatore Form No. 52 dt. 21st Dec., 1979 sent to the ITO/CBE. . 3. Construction of M.M.C. Building, Mysore--Date of contract 9th Sept., 1979--Value Rs. 1,23,35,000 Asst. yr. 1981-82 . 1. Construction of building for Government Hospital Out Patient Block, Coimbatore--Date of contract 28th May, 1980--Value Rs. 9,03,000 Form No. 52 dt. 12th June, 1980 sent to the ITO/CBE . 2. Construction of Commercial Complex Building at Dr. Nanjappa Road, Coimbatore-- Date of contract 3rd April, 1980--Value Rs. 16,50,000 Form No. 52 dt. 12th April, 1980 sent to the ITO/CBE. . Asst. yr. 1982-83 . Construction of Building for Sarada Mills, Coimbatore-- Date of contract 15th July, 19981--Value Rs. 8,50,000 Form No. 52 dt. 26th July, 1981 sent to the ITO/I(3)/CBE." . 8. The important question to be decided is whether the case put forward on behalf of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e." The reply of the assessee shows that though the CIT had specified in the show cause notice the particular contracts in respect of which intimation had not been furnished for each of the assessment years, the assessee was handicapped in stating definitely whether such intimations were sent or not because the managing partner had passed away suddenly on 6th Sept., 1982. The Accountant of the assessee had also left services. We have set out from the reply particulars given by the assessee of instances where they had sent requisite intimations. These instances, no doubt, start only from the asst. yr. 1979-80 onwards. However, the intimations sent have been in respect of substantial contracts. The assessee had filed before us copies of assessment orders from the year 1976-77 onwards. The particulars are: Assessment year Date of assessment order . Income returned Income assessed 1976-77 1-5-1976 . Rs. 49,135 Rs. 54,135 1977-78 20-5-1977 . Rs. 86,290 Rs. 89,080 1978-79 28-8-1978 . Rs. 94,510 Rs. 94,510 1979-80 30-7-1979 . Rs. 95,560 Rs. 95,560 1980-81 24-2-1981 . Rs. 55,400 Rs. 55,400 1981-82 7-10-1983 Loss Rs. 103,101 accepted 1982-83 25-5-1982 ....