2006 (10) TMI 201
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d against the order of the CIT(A) dt. 10th April, 2003 which pertains to asst. yr. 1997-98. 2. The assessee filed its return of income for asst. yr. 1997-98 on 29th Oct., 1997. The assessment was completed on 30th March, 2000 on a total income of Rs. 11,99,136. The appeal was decided by the learned CIT(A) on 8th Sept., 2000 and after that total income remained at Rs. 9,92,457. 3. Thereafter, the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sst. yr. 1997-98, was also not found favourable and hence the application was not allowed. 5. The assessee preferred an appeal against this order dt. 29th April, 2002, before the learned CIT(A), who also treated this claim of the assessee in the same manner as the learned AO did. 6. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the evidence on record. 7. The assessee has taken many grounds of....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI