Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1991 (11) TMI 122

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-tax Act in respect of the salaries received from the limited company in which he is a Director and from the firm in which he is a partner. The ITO has mentioned in his order that the assessee had not filed any evidence to establish the relationship of employer and the employee between the so called employers and himself. He has further mentioned that he had not filed a copy of Articles of Association and the terms of his employment by which he could be considered to be an employee of the Company. The ITO also mentioned that deductions under section 16(i) were not allowable in the case of salary as a partner because there was no relation as employee of the firm ; the assessee partner is an owner of the firm. 2. When the matter went before ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ars also these deductions were allowed to the assessee although the assessments were framed under section 143(1). 6. So far as salary from the firm was concerned, the learned counsel heavily relied on the decision of this Bench in the case of Chhitermal Goyal holding that a partner drawing salary was entitled to deductions under section 16(i). He also referred to the decision of the Bombay Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Mohammed Ibrahim Shahdad v. ITO [1980] 18 CTR (Trib.) 3 where also it had been held that a partner was entitled to standard deductions under section 16(i) from the salary received by him from the firm. 7. We have carefully considered the arguments from both the sides and have perused the record. We have also carefull....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llowing income shall be chargeable to Income-tax under the head " Salaries "-- (a) any salary due from an employer or a former employer to an assessee in the previous year, whether paid or not ; (b) any salary paid or allowed to him in the previous year by or on behalf of an employer or a former employer though not due or before it became due to him ; (c) any arrears of salary paid or allowed to him in the previous year by or on behalf of an employer or a former employer, if not charged to income-tax for any earlier previous year. " " Deductions from salaries : 16. The income chargeable under the the head " Salaries " shall be computed after making the following deductions, namely :-- (i) a deduction of a sum equal to thirty-three and....