Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1978 (1) TMI 99

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2. The assessee in asst. yr. 1970-71 had returned and income of Rs. 8,652 but the income finally assessed by the Tribunal was Rs. 16,450. For asst. yr. 1971-72, the income shown was Rs. 12,240 but was assessed at Rs. 21,900. The ITO started penalty proceedings but the assessee did not show cause in response to the notices served on it. The ITO, in both cases, held that the assessee had furnished....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n support of this contention our attention was invited to the order of the Tribunal for asst. yr. 1970-71 (page 4 of the compilation) wherein the Tribunal observed that the assessee maintained records showing mileage, fare receipts, expenses incurred etc. It is true that the ITO had invoked proviso to s. 145(1) of the IT Act and estimated the income, but for this reason alone, no inference of conc....