Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1984 (4) TMI 119

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....elate to asst. yr. 1979-80 and the assessee's accounts had entries of the following loans: (1) Shri Bhairam Balaji Rs. 10,000 . Interest " 927 (2) Shri Narendrakumar Motilal " 4,000 . Interest " 125 (3) Shri Rajkumaribai " 29,000 . Interest " 1,236 The ITO treated these amounts as borrowed on a hundi and taxed them under the provision of s. 69D of the IT Act. An appeal pre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... laboured attempt by saying that hundies are drawn only in big cities. Sec. 69D was thus not applicable to the facts of the case. Realising this, the assessee moved an application under s. 154 before the ITO and the ITO, by an order dt. 30th Dec., 1980, rectified the mistake. It was conceded in that order that s. 69D did not apply and two of the loans in favour of Narendrakumar and Rajkumari were ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt to tax the amount without consideration of any explanation of the assessee under s. 68 the amount can be taxed only if the assessee fails to satisfy the ITO. The ITO did not proceed on the lines of s. 68 and did not consider the explanation offered by the assessee about the nature and source of the aforesaid amounts. In the order passed under s. 154, he had felt satisfied about two of the three....