Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1984 (4) TMI 118

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ase the return of gift-tax was due to be filed on or before 30th June, 1970. The doner, Smt. Lilabai Matkar, expired on 27th Dec., 1971 and, hence, the return of gift tax was filed by Smt. Jijeebai Shinde, daughter and legal heir of the deceased, on 16th May, 1972. The GTO initiated penalty proceedings under s. 17(1)(a) of the GT Act and imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,266 on the assessee. 3. The asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oceedings in this case. He submitted that since the entire penalty proceedings were ab anitio void, the levy of penalty itself was unjustified. In support of this contention, he placed reliance on the decision of the Calcutta High Court in 92 ITR 215 (sic) which was later on approved by the Supreme Court in 140 ITR 477 (sic). Secondly, the contention of the ld. counsel is that in the estate duty a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t for payment of any penalty under s. 17 of the said Act. To support the above contention, he has placed reliance on the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in CIT vs. Abdul Majid (1983) 11 ITC 252 (MP). The ld. representative of the Department has not been able to rebut the above contentions of the ld. counsel. 5. After hearing the ld. representatives of the parties and goind through the r....