Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1984 (2) TMI 184

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es field satisfied that a dispute over certain principles of law is involved in the matter and so it proceeded to state the case. Accordingly, a draft statement of the case was prepared and drawn up on 22nd Dec., 1983 and the matter was ordered to be put up on 13th Jan., 1984 for finalisation of the draft. A perusal of the order sheet goes to show that on that date Shri S. G. Saxena appeared for the Department but none was present for the assessee. The Tribunal passed the order for finalising the draft statement. However, it transpires that later on the same date appearance was put in by the ld. counsel for the assessee and on the same day the matter was ordered to be refined on 21st Jan., 1984. on the nest date fixed for hearing the case w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....WT vs. Sayaji Mills Ltd. (1971) 82 ITR 663 (Guj). 5. The ld. Departmental Representative has, on the other hand, strongly contended that since the draft statement has been ordered to be finalised by the Tribunal it has expressed its final opinion that a referable question of law does arise out of the order of the Tribunal dt. 29th Jan., 1982 and that for this reason it is not open to the Tribunal to reconsider the matter. It was also submitted that the question supported by the Department is a question of law and that it should, therefore, be referred to the Hon'ble Court for its opinion. 6. We have considered the rival contentions and facts on record. As has already been pointed out above, a draft statement was drawn up on 23rd Dec., 198....