Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1982 (7) TMI 155

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ning of the assessments u/s 147 of the IT Act, 1961 for the asst. yrs. 1976-77, 1977-78 and 1978-79 was valid; (2) that the lower authorities have erred in clubbing the share income and interest of the minor child of the assessee in the firm of M/s. Sri Venkateswara Silks, Dharmavaram with the income of the assessee, an individual and who is the mother of the minor child for the above assessmen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to the income of the assessee u/s 64(1)(iii) of the IT Act 1961: .   Rs. 1976-77 Share income 9, 516 . Interest 12, 000 1977-78 Share income By 3, 095 . Interest 17, 075 1978-79 Share income 4, 294 . Interest 19, 986 The ld. counsel for the assessee had urged that the lower authorities have erred in including the above share i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....me court in the case of S. Srinivasan vs. CIT (1967) 63 ITR 273 (SC) and Submitted that in respect of payment of interest on accumulated profits the provisions of 64 (i)(iii) would be applicable. As regards the inclusion of the share income he submitted that the inclusion is quite in order. 4. We have considered the rival submissions. We have perused the deed of partnership of M/s. Shri Venkate....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or admitted to the benefits of the partnership could not be treated as a partner liable to make contributions towards capital. Therefore we agree with the submissions of the ld. Counsel of the assessee that the minor D. Venkatesulu is not obliged to make contributions of capital in the above firm. The other facts obtaining in this case are similar to the facts of the case of Sri Bajranglal referre....