Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1998 (12) TMI 106

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....icer determined an income of Rs. 41,714 for the assessment year 1982-83 and Rs. 76,200 for the assessment year 1983-84. The assessments have been confirmed in first appeal by the Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax(A), Hyderabad, in her order dated 9-7-1993 passed in appeal No. IT/ ATP/3 & 4/90-91. It is against the dismissal order of the Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax(A) that the assessee has come in second appeal before the Tribunal. 2. When the proceeding was called for hearing, nobody appeared for the assessee in spite of notice. But, the assessee has already filed paper-book in which the assessee has appealed to the Tribunal to decide the appeals on the facts and materials of case as available on record. In the circumstances, we heard Shri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as not allowed the amounts spent by the assessee by way of construction of houses, reclamation of land, etc. That is why, the Assessing Officer could make out the assessments on taxable incomes of Rs. 41,714 for the assessment year 1982-83 and Rs. 76,200 for the assessment year 1983-84. 6. The contentions raised by the assessee are that grant received from Bread for the World could not be treated as income of the assessee as the grant was tied-up with conditions and specifications, that unspent balance, if any, had to be returned to the donor, that the amounts spent for construction of houses, land reclamation, etc., have to be allowed as deductible expenditure and, therefore, the assessed income and tax demanded have no basis and justific....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....riculturists who are the beneficiaries. The purpose and activity of the assessee-society is to engage in such charitable activities. Whatever amount has been spent on those programmes / projects, they were spent in the usual course of carrying on its acclaimed objects. Therefore, there is no basis whatsoever, factual or legal, to hold that the amounts spent by the assessee in constructing houses or reclaiming land are capital expenditure. As far as the assessee is concerned, those expenses are revenue expenses. The assessee has no right or title over those properties. Those expenses were incurred as part of its normal activities for which the society was formed. Therefore, the money spent by the assessee-society in constructing houses, recl....