Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1984 (2) TMI 178

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ends in the subsequent year i.e. on 30th Jan., 1981 relevant the asst. yr. 1982-83. According to the assessee the foreign income received should be assessed for the year 1982-83. In this connection he also placed reliance on the decision of Andhra Pradesh High Court in Addl. CIT A.P. vs. K. Ramachandra Rao (1981) 20 CTR (AP) 60 : (1981) 127 ITR 414 (AP). But however, the ITO was not agreeable to the submissions made by the assessee. According to him the decision cited by the assessee stands on a different footing. According to the ITO, the source of income is the same i.e. salary for both the Indian and foreign incomes while in the case cited by the assessee there are two different sources of income i.e. income from profession and income f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tor of Vijaya Commercial Bank. Until the asst. yr. 1968-69, he was being assessed under two heads viz. profession and salary and the salary income of the assessee received from Indian Law Reports and Vijaya Commercial Bank was being assessed under the latter head, the previous year chosen ending on 31st March of every year. He was appointed as a judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court on 21st Aug., 1968. For the asst. yr. 1969-70, the assessee claimed that he maintained separate accounts in respect of salary income as a judge and made up accounts for the previous year ending on 31st July, 1969 and, therefore, it should be assessed in the asst. yr. 1970-71 and not 1969-70. On these facts, the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the election o....