Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1993 (9) TMI 167

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... was stated to be post-polio paralysis and the extent was stated to be 60%. This was the certificate dated 29-12-1983 given by Dr. A.C. Reddy, Civil Surgeon, Orthopaedics, Government General Hospital, Guntur. Another certificate dated 4-12-1986 from Dr. V. Bhaskara Rao, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Government General Hospital, Guntur, was filed which shows that the assessee had an attack of poliomyelitis in his childhood affecting the left lower limb and he had got paralysis of entire left lower limb with loss of power of the left hip, knee and ankle joints. According to the ITO, both the certificates nowhere certified that the assessee had been suffering from a permanent physical disability conforming to rule 11D(a) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that it had the effect of substantially reducing his capacity to engage in gainful employment. Had he not been suffering from the disability, he would have employed himself in a more gainful employment. 4. The learned departmental representative, on the other hand, supporting the order of the DC (Appeals), submitted that the mere fact that the assessee has been in gainful employment is sufficient to take the case of the assessee out of the provisions of section 80U. According to him, no interference is called for in the orders of the departmental authorities. 5. I have heard the parties and considered the rival submissions. Section 80U entitles an assessee to claim a deduction if he is either totally blind or suffers from a permanent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uman body. Loss of a limb undoubtedly affects the capacity of a person - the capacity not only for moving about but also for achieving one's goals in various walks of life. In income-tax language, it affects and/or reduces the capacity of an assessee to be gainfully employed. The mere fact that the assessee in the present case is a lecturer in a college and is earning such income as other lecturers having both the limbs are earning does not mean that the loss of his one limb did not affect or reduce his capacity to be gainfully employed. One should not close one's enquiry by just knowing what a person is but should extend the horizon of one's vision to find out what he could have been had he not lost his limb. A lot of hurdles. obstacles an....