Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1993 (12) TMI 102

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....order is Rs. 1,07,950 for asst. year 1979-80 which is reduced to Rs. 57,950 consequent to the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). It is Rs. 1,71,740 for assessment year 1980-81 and is reduced to Rs. 46,920. The orders which are under appeal before the Tribunal are the assessment orders wherein the income was determined at Rs. 1,07,950 and Rs. 1,71,740. The assessee's submission is that her income as modified consequent to the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) should be the determinative figure for the fee to be paid by the assessee. The contention of the revenue, on the other hand, is that it is the income as computed in the original assessment that must be the figure to determine the fee to be paid by the assessee. 4. Section 253(6) reads as under: "An appeal to the Appellate Tribunal shall be in the prescribed form and shall be verified in the prescribed manner and shall, in the case of an appeal made on or after the 1st day of June, 1992, irrespective of the date of initiation of the assessment proceedings relating thereto, be accompanied by a fee of,--- (a) where the total income of the assessee as computed by the Assessing Officer in the case to which the appeal re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d results, has to be avoided. We, therefore, hold that the total income which was computed in the orders of the Assessing Officer which are subject-matter of appeal before the Tribunal is relevant and if in those orders the assessed income is more than Rs. 1 lakh, a fee of Rs. 1,500 has to be paid for filing the appeal before the Tribunal. Thus, in this case, the proper fee payable by the assessee would be Rs. 1,500. 5. The fee in the second category depends upon the meaning of the term "total income". It is defined under section 2(45) to mean total income referred to in section 5 computed in the manner laid down in the Act. Section 5 defines the scope of "total income" and provides that the total income of any person includes all income from whatever source derived which is received or is deemed to have been received, accrues or arises or is deemed to have accrued or arisen. Chapter III consisting of sections 10 to 13A provides for certain incomes not forming part of total income. One such exemption is agricultural income provided under section 10(1) of the Act. Chapter IV provides how the total income is to be computed and section 14 thereof provides that the computation of to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-------------- I.T.A.No.                   Asst. Year             Total income          Losses of      Total       Fee                                                                   before set               earlier year   income      pay-                                             &nbsp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1363/Hyd/1992           1984-85                47,42,18,060         47,42,18,060        nil          250 1364/Hyd/1992           1979-80                  5,40,90,804           5,40,90,804        nil          250 1096/Hyd/1993           1989-90                       1,93,447                1,93,447        ni....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ject. The Board's Circular No. 636 dated 31-8-1992, relied upon by the counsels, nowhere states that if the loss is more than Rs. 1 lakh, the fee would in that case also be Rs. 250. In any case, the Board's interpretation does not bind the Tribunal in considering the provisions of the statute. We, therefore, hold that the fee payable in these two appeals would be Rs. 1,500. 7. The last situation is where the total income assessed is less than Rs. 1 lakh but if the agricultural income is considered, it becomes more than Rs. 1 lakh. This position obtains in the case of Shri N. V. Soma Raju [IT Appeal No. 961 (Hyd.) of 1993]. The total income before set off in this case is Rs. 58,011. After setting off the loss, it works out to 'nil'. Agricultural income as per the assessment order is Rs. 1,37,556. As discussed above, the total income is the aggregate amount of the incomes which are not excluded in computing the total income under Chapter III. Agricultural income is one income which is not to be included while computing the total income of an assessee and that is provided in sub-section (1) of section 10 of the IT Act. The inclusion of agricultural income for determining the tax pa....