Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1988 (12) TMI 149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndividual, with previous year ending 31st March derived income from three sources, namely, salary, share income in a firm and other sources during the relevant previous year. A sum of Rs. 50,000 was contributed by him to Shri Navchetana Pragati Mandal (hereinafter referred as 'Mandal') Veerabar, Gujarat and claimed as deduction under section 35CCA of the Act. 4. During the assessment completed by the income-tax Officer under section 143(3) of the Act, the aforesaid deduction was allowed. However, the assessee was served with a notice by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax under section 263 of the Act to show cause as to why the order passed by the Income-tax Officer granting exemption in respect of the aforesaid Rs. 50,000 to the Mandal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 35CCA. 9. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that so long a payment was made by an assessee from his income derived from business, though as a partner, there was no restriction placed by the statute to its allowability under section 35CCA inasmuch as the deduction is made available to an 'assessee' with no particular qualification. It was also submitted that the mere absence of the eligibility of such an exemption in section 67 of the Act would not make any difference. Controverting these submissions the learned Senior Departmental Representative, contended before us that the Act by section 67 prescribed the mode for the completion of partner's share in the income of the firm. That in the wake of sub-section (3) of section 67 per....