1977 (12) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....these contracts made the assessee liable to tax as he earned sufficient income which after appeal has been determined at Rs. 36,474. The assessee was, therefore, liable to file his return of income voluntarily under s. 139(1) of the IT Act on or before 30th Sept., 1969 so far as the question of penalty under s. 271(1)(a) is concerned. However, this return was filed on 21st Jan., 1971 after a delay of 15 complete months. The return was, however, filed voluntarily after the assessee was advised that his notion that he is not liable to file return voluntarily is erroneous. 3. The ITO, however, issued a show cause to the assessee why penalty need not be levied for this delay. The explanation of the assessee was that he had a bona fide belief....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... thereon accordingly. 7. In appeal, before us, the learned counsel for the assessee contended that the assessee being a salaried employee had never been conscious of voluntary payment of tax and no return had been filed in the earlier years. The assessee got the contract and sufficient income was earned to make him liable to tax. However, he continued to nurse his old belief that he was not required to file the return of income voluntarily and this bona fide belief resulted in delay in submission of the return which was ultimately filed when the earlier employer of the assessee told him that he had to file the return voluntarily. As soon as the assessee realised the mistake, the return was filed and belated advance-tax was paid immediate....