Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (4) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....VIII/6034, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi AAAPW 3059R 4. Dr. Roshan Lal F-15/6, Krishan Ngr. New Delhi Applied 5. Mr. I.M. Kochar A-61, Priyadarshni Vr. New Delhi - 3. During the year, Mrs. Usha Chopra, Mrs. Vandana Chawla and Mrs. Aradhana Sondhi were the Principals, Vice-Principals and Incharge, Pochanpur School, respectively. During the year, they were paid the following salaries and supervisory charges: Sl. No. Name Designation Salary Supervisory allowance Other Allow Total Amt. 1. Mrs. Usha Chopra Principal 4,34,880 3,09,000 - 7,43,880 2. Mrs. Vandana, Chawla Vice-Principal 2,20,200 1,06,500   3,26,700 3. Mrs. Aradhana Sodhi Incharge of P/Pur, 68,700 39,000   1,07,700 4. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO asked the assessee to justify the payment of supervisory allowances to the abovenamed three persons. Vide letter dt. 10th Feb., 2000, the assessee explained the same. After considering the reply of the assessee, the AO observed that the reply of the learned authorised representative is very vague to say the least. No specific extra responsibi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t only for the purposes of teaching text books. The institution has the students from all corners of the city. The school and its vast arrary of activities are such that there is constant movement of staff and students to various parts of the city for school related activities. It could be for inter-school competitions, exhibitions, visits to museum, special service projects, staff workshops, Government bodies, meetings with outside authorities. These staff members with or without students are often provided snack/lunch/refreshment which expenditure is reimbursed. Staff meetings are a regular part of our routine. These meetings may be for entire staff or for smaller groups during school hours or after. There is always a provision for some refreshment/lunch/snack, etc. at such meeting held at regular intervals. The school is divided into 8 houses; at such meetings various extra-curricular activities are engaged and children participating in such extra activities which often extend to beyond school hours, are often served some small snack etc. prizes are also given to children. The school has a myriad or activities taking place throughout the year. Dozens of dignitaries, visitors com....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der to get exemption under s. 10(22), the assessee should have primarily engaged itself in educational activities. It may, however, take other activities incidentally for the benefit of the students or in furtherance of their education. In CIT vs. Academy of General Education (1984) 38 CTR (Kar) 239 : (1984) 150 ITR 135 (Kar), it was held that the funds may be invested in any manner, but the income therefrom must be exclusively utilised for educational activities. The word 'solely' means 'exclusively' and not 'primarily'. With this meaning of the word, 'solely' in view, even if the assessee trust had spent to the extent of 90 per cent of its income towards educational purposes and only 10 per cent towards religious or other purposes, it could still not be held that the trust was existing solely for educational purposes. This is what the word 'exclusively' as distinguished from 'primarily' signifies. But if the balance 10 per cent activity was ancillary or incidental to educational purpose, the exemption cannot be denied to the assessee vide CIT vs. Maharaja Sawai Mansinghji Museum Trust (1987) 65 CTR (Raj) 46 : (1988) 169 ITR 379 (Raj). 9. The AO, therefore, denied exemption und....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ra and Smt. Vandana Chawla have been mentioned on pp. 21 to 24 of the paper book. It was stated that Smt. Usha Chopra is the Principal of all the institutions. For that purpose in addition to administration of the schools from where she draws the remuneration, she also visits various schools run by the society for administration purposes. Similar was the case with Shri R.L. Chopra and Smt. Vandana Chawla. The learned counsel stated that even assuming that the remuneration paid to them was excessive, it will not change the character of the society/institution. Still the institution solely existed for educational purposes. The reliance was placed on the decision of Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench) in the case of Dy. CIT vs. Cosmo Politan Educational Society (1999) 157 CTR (Raj) 209 : (2000) 244 ITR 494 (Raj). In the said case, the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court has held that if the income of the institution is misutilised or mismanaged for personal gains of the members, the action could be taken against the members of the society. It was stated that the SLP against the decision of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court has been dimissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as mentioned in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the society or their relatives. The fact is that the interest @ 10 per cent was charged on the amount of loan advanced to them. The learned counsel further confirmed that the entire loans given to the members and their relatives have been recovered back upto financial year 1999-2000. Learned counsel clarified that earlier the institution did not have its own building. The institution was being run in the building owned by Mrs. Usha Chopra. By an agreement, the rent for the premises was fixed which was payable to Mrs. Chopra. Mrs. Chopra was paid a lumpsum amount of loan as advance rent which was being adjusted against the rent from year to year. Thus, it cannot be said that the advance of loan to Mrs. Chopra was without any educational purposes. Such advance was warranted for the purposes of carrying on educational activities. Subsequently, when the school constructed its own building, the payment of rent was stopped because the institution shifted to its own building. But as certain advances were still with Mrs. Chopra, the same were recovered back by financial year 1999-2000. This fact alone cannot lead to a conclusion that the advance to Mrs. Chopra was for the purposes of makin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (2001) 252 ITR 837 (Raj), the Amritsar Bench of the Tribunal in the case of ITO vs. Model Institution of Education & Research (2001) 72 TTJ (Asr) 897 : (2001) 77 ITD 375 (Asr). The learned counsel further argued that in the context of s. 10(22), the applicability of ss. 11 to 13 has no role to play. While relying on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Aditanar Educational Institution vs. Addl. CIT (1997) 139 CTR (SC) 7 : (1997) 224 ITR 310 (SC) at 318, the learned counsel stated that for the purposes of exemption under s. 10(22), the sole purpose means the dominance of that purpose. The learned counsel, therefore, argued that the AO may be directed to allow exemption under s. 10(22) of the Act. 16. On the other hand, learned Departmental Representative stated that the society has not been registered under s. 12A of the Act. It has not been granted exemption under s. 80-G of the Act. So, the institution cannot be said to be a public charitable institution. The society is run by the interested persons and so the institution. While referring to the decision Sole Trustee, Lok Shiksana Trust vs. CIT 1975 CTR (SC) 281 : (1975) 101 ITR 234 (SC) and in the case Addl. CIT vs. Surat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (ii) The society has advanced the loans to the members and relatives on which no interest was charged. (iii) Certain vouchers were unsigned and certain vouchers were not supported by the bills. (iv) Certain personal expenses have been debited to income and expenditure account of the society which had no relationship with imparting the education. The list of such expenses has been given in the annexures to the assessment order. (v) The society has given donation of Rs. 25,000 which has nothing to do with the educational purposes. 19. Sec. 10(22) of the Act under which the exemption has been claimed by the assessee reads as under: "Any income of university or other educational institution, existing solely for educational purposes and not for purposes of profits." 20. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Aditanar Educational Institution has held that the exemption was given to the income of an educational institution. Such educational institution will not cease to be one existing for educational purposes even if from these activities, some surplus results. Thus, the emphasis has been laid down by the Supreme Court on the objects of the institution. The Hon'bl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rience of 20 years. She is very keen in developing the co-curricular activities of the school. Due to her efforts, the school has became a centre for many inter-school debates, mathematic Olympiad, art and crafts. Her interest in the classical music generated an inter-action with "SPIC & MACAY", a leading society involved in the rejuvenation of Indian classical music, art and culture. In such programmes, the leading proponents of Indian classical music like Bhimsen Joshi, Hari Prasad Chourasia, Ustad Bismillah Khan have performed for the benefit of the students of the school. Under the circumstances, the supervisory charges paid to her were solely for the purposes of education. 24. As regards AO's observations regarding loans given to the members and relatives without interest, we find that such an observation made by the AO is incorrect. The society has charged interest @ 10 per cent on the loans advanced to the members/relatives. In this connection, it will not be out of place to mention that the society took over the schools run by Mrs. Usha Chopra. As the school did not had its building, the school agreed for the payment of rent to Mrs. Usha Chopra. The advance rent was paid....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Mala Bali, Ustad Jakir Hussain, Smt. Shiela Dixit, CM of Delhi, Shri Sahib Singh Verma, Smt. Sushma Swaraj and Shri Madan Lal Khurana, former CM of Delhi, eminent cricketer Shri Kapil Dev and many more. The inspectious are also carried out at periodical invervals by Department of Education. The school has to also interact with various other Departments including NCERT. Such dignatories have to be provided meals and refreshments. On various other occasions, like teachers' day, founder's day, Diwali and other festivals, eminent personalities are invited and the staff members were also presented with small gifts as a token of their work and zeal. Such gifts include sarees, suits, silver coins, etc. The expenditures on such items were, therefore, warranted by the educational purposes. By no stretch of imagination, such expenditure could be said to be misutilisation of the society's fund. The AO has mentioned above certain expenses on medical facilities to the members and the relatives. It was stated that while making these observations, the AO has altogether ignored the fact that any extra expenditure provided on the medical facilities to the members/relatives was recovered from them....