1981 (11) TMI 93

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eafter the assessee filed a miscellaneous application pointing out that the factory building had fallen to the share of the assessee on the dissolution of the partnership and, therefore, registration of the building in favour of the assessee was not required. It was also pointed out that certain rulings relied upon, on behalf of the assessee of the hearing had not considered. The Tribunal found th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dmissible since the building did not stand registered in the name of the company. 4. It was urged before the learned AAC that the building was wholly owned by the company and is used for the purpose of its business. Due to certain technical difficulties the registered sale deed could not be executed in favour of the assessee. It was pointed out that depreciation should be allowed on building ow....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ee-company took over possession of a certain flour mill and consideration was paid by the assessee by allotting its shares on the face value of the sale price to the seller. Execution of the deed was postponed and it could not be executed during the previous year relevant to the assessment year1958-59. The question was whether the assessee was entitled to depreciation on the flour mill. The Delhi ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessee did not derive title to the property by purchase but it had fallen to its share on dissolution of the partnership. Reliance was placed on the Supreme Court decision in the case of Malabar Fisheries Co. v. CIT [1979] 120 ITR 49 for the proposition that on dissolution of a partnership there is only a mutual adjustment of rights between the partners and there is no question of any extin....