Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1990 (9) TMI 142

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....335 had separately been made, this injustice has been set right by the first appellate authority. In respect of disallowance of Rs. 18,208 the learned counsel contended that most of the expenditure related to purchase of sweets etc. provided to the customers on Diwali and other occasions. The learned counsel accordingly contended that the expenditure related to the business and thus was allowable as a deduction in computing the income from business. The learned counsel relied upon the decision of ITAT Chandigarh Bench in the case of Sandika (P.) Ltd. v. ITO [1982] 13 TTJ 394 and on the decision of the Ahmedabad Bench in the case of ITO v. SLM Maneklal Industries Ltd. [1986] 17 ITD 575, for the proposition that the Diwali expenses is expendi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e next ground of appeal relates to levy of interest u/s 216. Assessee filed a statement of advance tax as required u/s 209A, on15th September, 1982declaring income of Rs. 10,58,000. Simultaneously Form No. 29 being higher estimate of income was filed showing an income of Rs. 16 lakhs. Two advance tax instalments on the basis of estimated income of Rs. 16 lakhs had been paid by the assessee. On15th March, 1983assessee revised the estimate showing income of Rs. 25 lakhs and paid the advance tax within time. According to the assessing officer assessee has under-estimated the advance tax payable by him and accordingly thereby reduced the amount payable in two instalments. Thus assessee has been held to be liable to interest under section 216. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ax as accords with such statement in equal instalments. Sub-section (2) of Section 209A gives an option to the assessee to file estimate of income in lieu of statement of advance tax if the current income of the assessee is likely to be less than the income on which advance tax is payable on the basis of statement of advance tax under sub-section (1). Under sub-section (3) of Section 209A assessee is also given an option to file an estimate of income at any time before the last instalment is due in such case if his current income is likely to be less than the income on which advance tax is payable by him on the basis of statement of advance-tax is filed by him. Sub-section (4) of Section 209A makes it obligatory for those assessees whose in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ly deferred the payment of advance tax on a part of his income, he may direct that the assessee shall pay simple interest at 15 per cent per annum-- (i) in the case referred to in clause (a), for the period during which the payment was deficient, on the difference between the amount paid in each such instalment and the amount which should have been paid, having regard to the aggregate advance tax actually paid during the year ; and (ii) in the case referred to in clause (b), for the period during which the payment of advance tax was so deferred. " For the purpose of levy of interest u/s 216 the assessing officer must be satisfied that by reason of under-estimate of income the assessee has reduced the amount payable in either of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed a revised estimate of income showing an income of Rs. 16 lakhs on15th September, 1982though the assessee's obligation to file revised estimate was to be fulfilled by the date on which the last instalment of advance tax was due. The bona fides of the assessee are established when it is seen that assessee has paid more advance tax than could lawfully be expected from it. In our view, interest u/s 216 is imposable in such cases where assessee files an estimate of income claiming his current income to be less than the income on the basis of which the advance tax is lawfully due. Thus where an estimate is filed under sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) of Section 209A, assessee would be duty bound to show that the estimate filed by him was a b....