Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1980 (6) TMI 62

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sessee is a firm. In respect of the income of the period from 1st day of April 1975 to 31st day of March, 1976 two returns of total income were furnished--one covered the period from 1st day of April, 1975 to 30th Sept., 1975 and the other covered the period from 1st Oct., 1975 to 31st day of march, 1976. Two partners of the firm M/s. Gulab Singh Lachhi Ram, namely; Bhagwan Das and Chandu Lal were....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessments regarding total income of the two broken periods as aforesaid, should have been made. The said contention was accepted by the Commissioner on strength of Ramkrishanshingh & Sons vs. CIT(1), Addl. CIT vs. Vinayak Cinema(2), CIT vs. Kunj Behari Shyamlal(3), and Badri Narani Kashi Prasad vs. Addl. CIT.(4) 4. Department is aggrieved from the said finding. Assessment in this case was mad....