Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1978 (7) TMI 140

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ouse property and rent free unfurnished accommodation. 2. The undisputed facts are that M/s. Escorts Ltd. took on rent house property bearing No. D-85 Panchsheel Enclave from Smt. Niranjan Kaur w/o the assessee and paid her a rent of Rs. 11,088 for the financial year ending31st March, 1976. The ITO found that the assessee's wife was the benamidar of the assessee and the property really belonged t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itted that the AAC was not justified in taxing the same income under two heads i.e., as income from house property and rent-free unfurnished accommodation. The action of the AAC was stated to be illegal as he could not assess new sources of income namely property let out as well as rent free unfurnished accommodation. In the alternative it was submitted that the action of the AAC in not valuing th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd of the value of the perquisite received by the assessee as an employee under r. 3 of the IT Rules. It was admitted before me that the assessee's wife Smt. Niranjan Kaur was the assessee's benamidar and the property really belonged to the assessee. 7. Property even though taken ostensibly from Smt. Niranjan Kaur by the assessee's employer M/s. Escorts Ltd. and the rent of Rs. 11,088 paid to her....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ancial year ending31st March 1975onwards. The CBDT circular provides inter alia as follows: "In the case of employees residing inBombay,Calcutta,DelhiandMadrasthe existing instructions of the Board would continue to apply and as such, only the excess over 30 per cent of the Salary will be added to the basic valuation of 10 per cent of the Salary in such case." The error in the computation of the....