Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1980 (3) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... June, 1974. The assessee claimed sales promotion expenditure of Rs. 4,655 in the Head Office atDelhi, Rs. 63 in the branch office atBombayand Rs. 145 in the branch office atCalcutta. These three amounts were disallowed by the ITO on the ground that the expenditure was in the nature of entertainment. 2. On appeal, the AAC observed that the expenditure incurred was for providing tea, cold drinks....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... case of CIT vs. M/s Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd. in that case the question for consideration before the Tribunal was whether a sum of Rs. 5,286 on account of messing expenses which was disallowed by the ITO but which was allowed by the AAC was to be treated as entertainment expenditure or not. The Revenue came in appeal before the Tribunal and has relied on the decision of the Allahabad High Court....