1979 (2) TMI 127

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessee had purchased low quality of paddy at cheaper rate, and that there were excessive rains which affected the yield adversely and that more polishing had to be done due to which yield of ghutta had gone up. None of these reasons found favour with the ITO as they were go general nature. He found that many other manufactures in the area had disclosed a yield of 67.5 per cent. He adopted this rate for the assessee also. On this basis, he worked out a shortage of 320 qtls. of rice. He estimated its cost at Rs. 96 per qtl. Rs. 30,720. This amount was added by him to the total income of the assessee. 2. The assessee appealed to the AAC. an additional reason was given to him that the assessee had made purchases of more than half of paddy o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cases the payments made by the assessee to other parties were either not recorded in the books of the assessee at all or were found to have been recorded at a later date thereby suggesting that the assessee had made the payment out of undisclosed income. He also examined those parties and allowed the assessee an opportunity of cross-examination. After being satisfied that the assessee had failed to explain the source of such payments which were mostly in cash, he held that amounts had come out of the assessee's undisclosed income. He found out the peak of the such amount which according to him worked out at Rs. 13,000. He brought this amount to tax as the income of the assessee. Similarly, he added four other smaller amounts aggregating Rs.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the year under appeal. the second submission made out before us was that the peak credit of the entire amount was only Rs. 12,081 and further that no separate addition should have been made for the amount of Rs. 1,516 which should have been treated to have been covered by the above peak. the third submission was that the assessee did not have any other source of income and, therefore, the above amount should have been treated to have come out of its rice business and should have been set off against the addition of Rs. 20,000 sustained by the AAC. this was based on the principle that double addition was not permissible under the IT Act. The learned Departmental Representative while submitting that it was s. 69 of the Act which applied to th....