Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (9) TMI 215

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....med income under s. 115J of the IT Act, 1961. The learned AO levied interest under ss. 234B and 234C for short payment of advance tax on the aforesaid deemed income. The learned AO also levied interest under s. 201(1A) on delayed deposits of tax deducted at source. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) who, relying upon the ratio of decision rendered in the case of Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. vs. Asstt. CIT (1993) 199 TTR 170 (AT)(SB) upheld levy of interest under ss. 234B and 234C of the IT Act. The learned CIT(A) also upheld levy of interest under s. 201(1A) as the assessee did not file any submission against charging of interest under s. 201(1A). Still aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before us. 4. Shri R. San....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....est under ss. 234B and 234C, in similar circumstances, was upheld. Reliance was also placed on the Tribunal decision in Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. vs. Asstt. CIT. It was further submitted that when two different High Courts have expressed conflicting views, and when jurisdictional High Court is silent on the issue, the Tribunal is free to adopt the view which seems more reasonable to the Tribunal or to follow Tribunal's earlier decisions, if any, on the issue. Both the High Court judgments, in such circumstances, have equal persuasive value. Regarding levy of interest under s. 201(1A), Shri Tayal submitted that since fact about delayed deposit of tax deducted at source, and quantification thereof, was mentioned in the tax audit report itself,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court, when a deeming fiction is brought under the statute, it is to be carried to its logical conclusion but without creating further deeming fiction so as to include other provisions of the Act which are not made specifically applicable. It is thus evident that views of these two High Courts are in direct conflict with each other. Clearly, therefore, there is no meeting ground between these two judgments and we are also unable to accept the suggestion that we can follow earlier decisions of this Tribunal, or such views, whichever seem more reasonable to us, of one of these High Courts. 7. It may be mentioned that some Benches of the Tribunal have either taken independent view on the issue in this appeal or h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Vegetable Products Ltd. 1973 CTR (SC) 177 : (1972) 88 ITR 192 (SC). Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down a principle that "if two reasonable constructions of a taxing provisions are possible, that construction which favours the assessee must be adopted". This principle has been consistently followed by the various authorities as also by the Hon'ble Supreme Court itself. In another Supreme Court judgment, Petron Engg. Construction (P) Ltd. & Anr. vs. CBDT & Ors. (1988) 75 CTR (SC) 20 : (1989) 175 ITR 523 (SC), it has been reiterated that the above principle of law is well established and there is no doubt about that. Hon'ble Supreme Court had, however, some occasions to deviate from this general principle of interpretation of taxing statute w....