Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Ranchi, Feb 25 (PTI) The Jharkhand High Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by the relatives of former minister Kamlesh Singh in a complaint case registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
Kamlesh Singh's son Surya Sonal Singh, daughter Ankita Singh and son-in-law Narendra Mohan Singh had filed a criminal revision petition before the high court seeking quashing of the complaint case filed by the ED against them.
Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay dismissed the petition filed by the three.
The petitioners urged before the court that they had been falsely implicated in the case by the ED because they happen to be close relatives of Kamlesh Singh, accused of money laundering.
Allegations against Surya Sonal Singh, Ankita Singh and Narendra Mohan Singh were that they had indulged in laundering black money accumulated by Kamlesh Singh.
It is also stated that as much as Rs 83 lakh was rotated by the accused persons through four accounts in a day.
Thereafter, the money was again reverted to the account of Kamlesh Singh.
The ED has been successful in mapping the money trail and how money was laundered from one account to the other, which finally came back to Kamlesh Singh.
Kamlesh Singh has been implicated in the case along with his wife, Madhu Singh for money laundering Rs 5.83 crore. PTI CORR NAM NN
Money laundering allegations in relatives' petition before High Court over Enforcement Directorate's tracing of rotated funds. Challenge to an Enforcement Directorate complaint alleging relatives of an accused engaged in laundering by rotating funds through four accounts and reverting them to the principal accused; petitioners sought quashing of the complaint claiming false implication due to kinship, while the ED relied on transaction mapping and the identified money trail as the operative factual matrix implicating the accused and his spouse.Press 'Enter' after typing page number.