New Delhi, Dec 4 (PTI) The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday conducted searches at multiple locations in Meghalaya as part of a money laundering probe into alleged misappropriation of funds at the Garo Hills Autonomous District Council (GHADC), officials said.

These are the maiden raids undertaken by the federal probe agency's sub zonal office located in Shillong after registering a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in the state.

The agency has conducted similar action in the state as part of cases registered in other states.

At least five premises in Tura under the West Garo Hills district were raided, the officials said.

The probe relates to the alleged non-execution of developmental works and the misappropriation of funds allocated for the development of the Asanang constituency under the GHADC.

According to officials, out of a total allocation of Rs 28.66 crore, members of the committee, in collusion with certain contractors, "diverted" and "misused" the funds in contravention of established rules and procedures.

In particular, instances have been noticed where 60 per cent of the sanctioned funds were "irregularly" released to contractors Kubon Sangma and Nikseng Sangma, contrary to the applicable rules and provisions as advance, they said.

Acting under the directions of one Ismail Marak, multiple cheques were issued in their names and subsequently, Kubon Sangma withdrew the entire amount and handed it over to Marak, while Nikseng Sangma transferred his share directly to the bank account as directed, the ED officials said. PTI NES DV DV

Meghalaya raids probe alleged diversion of Rs 28.66 crore in GHADC development funds and irregular advances to contractors. The Enforcement Directorate, acting under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, conducted searches in Tura after registering a PMLA case concerning alleged diversion and misuse of Rs 28.66 crore allocated for development in the Garo Hills Autonomous District Council. The probe alleges about 60% of sanctioned funds were irregularly released as advances to contractors, cheques were issued under an intermediary's direction, and funds were withdrawn or transferred to accounts before being routed to the intermediary, raising misappropriation and money laundering concerns.