<h1>Son of former chief minister challenges Section 19 arrest, seeks quashing over lack of prior notice and custody duration</h1> The Supreme Court sought responses from the Centre and the Enforcement Directorate within 10 days to a challenge by the son of a former state chief minister to certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and to his arrest in an alleged liquor-related probe. The petitioner contends he was arrested under Section 19 without prior summons or notice and only on alleged non-cooperation, and seeks quashing of the grounds of arrest. The court questioned the duration of custody and interpretation of the law; the ED says it has a three-month period to complete its probe amid multiple investigations into alleged scams during the ex-minister's tenure.