1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Central Excise Cases: Immunity Granted, Duty Demand Dropped, Decisions Set Aside, and Penalty Vacated Across Various Cities.</h1> A series of recent Central Excise cases highlight various issues and rulings. In one case, the Settlement Commission in Chennai addressed clandestine removal by an EOU without permission for DTA clearance, granting immunity from prosecution but not from interest and penalties. Another case involved the CESTAT in Chennai, where a proposal to demand differential duty was dropped due to lack of grounds. In Kolkata, a decision was set aside due to lack of evidence and reasoning. In Chennai, the determination of capital goods credit was remanded for further verification. Lastly, in New Delhi, a declaration issue regarding grey fabrics led to vacating a personal penalty.