Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
New Delhi, Mar 26 (PTI) Delhi Assembly Leader of Opposition (LoP) Atishi has accused the ruling BJP of deliberately curtailing discussions on the Annual Budget 2025-26 and may be trying to hide crucial economic details.
In a letter to Speaker Vijender Gupta, Atishi expressed outrage over the assembly's 'List of Business' for the day, which allocates barely an hour for Budget discussions – a move she termed "deeply worrying" and an attempt to avoid scrutiny.
Responding to Atishi's letter, Gupta said her claim that only one hour was set aside for the budget discussion was "incorrect." He said that the Business Advisory Committee of the Assembly, which includes AAP MLAs, had decided that the budget discussion would take place over two days, on March 26 and 27.
Atishi also pointed out that the government had failed to present the Economic Survey - a standard parliamentary practice - before tabling the budget, and wondered whether this was an attempt to withhold vital economic data from the public.
"It almost seems that the Government wants to avoid a detailed discussion on the Budget. Is this Budget based on fictitious revenue projections and economic trends? Is that why the Economic Survey wasn't presented?" she wrote in her letter.
The Aam Aadmi Party leader said she was shocked to see the day's 'List of Business,' which revealed that only one hour had been set aside for the budget discussion, with the remaining time packed with other agenda items, including a CAG report, discussions on water shortages and drainage issues, and committee reports.
"How can an Assembly of 70 MLAs spend barely an hour discussing the most important financial document of the year?" Atishi said. "Will this crucial debate be sandwiched between five other agenda items? This is deeply worrying," she added.
The former Delhi chief minister stressed the importance of the budget debate as vital not only for the legislators, but also for the city voters.
"The Budget determines how taxpayer money will be spent - on hospitals, schools, infrastructure, and essential services. Rushing this discussion undermines the people's right to transparency," she said.
Calling on the Speaker to ensure the "sanctity of parliamentary procedures," Atishi urged him to extend the session if necessary.
The next two days should be devoted solely to the budget discussion, with the remaining business taken up on March 28, or the session extended by a day if needed, she appealed.
This is the first budget presented by a BJP-led government in Delhi in over 26 years, following the party's victory in last month's Assembly elections.
Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, who also holds the finance portfolio, presented the 2025-26 budget in the Delhi Assembly, announcing a total outlay of Rs 1 lakh crore for the upcoming financial year on Tuesday. PTI NSM NSM VN VN
Budget scrutiny curtailed: opposition says restricted debate and missing Economic Survey undermine fiscal transparency and oversight. The Leader of Opposition alleges the ruling party curtailed debate on the Annual Budget by allotting minimal time on the List of Business, compressing discussion and undermining scrutiny of fiscal allocations. She also notes the Economic Survey was not presented before the budget, questioning the transparency of revenue projections, and urges the Speaker to extend or reallocate session time to ensure thorough parliamentary oversight and adherence to procedure.Press 'Enter' after typing page number.