Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Mumbai, Feb 26 (PTI) The Bombay High Court on Wednesday directed the Customs department to explain through an affidavit how its September 2024 show-cause notice raising a tax demand of $1.4 billion from Skoda Auto Volkswagen India was not barred by limitation.
A division bench of Justices B P Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla has been extensively hearing the plea filed by the automobile company challenging the notice on the grounds that it was arbitrary and illegal.
The auto major has called the demand for $1.4 billion, over Rs 12,000 crore, “exorbitant”.
In its notice, Customs said the company provided misleading information, concerning its imports, to the department.
The Customs has claimed that the company misclassified its imports of Audi, Skoda and Volkswagen cars as “individual parts” instead of “Completely Knocked Down” (CKD) units, thereby paying significantly lower customs duties.
The main contention of the company was that the department could not have raised the tax demand after all these years. The company has contended that it has been paying tax for over a decade under the individual parts category.
To now suddenly say that tax ought to be paid as per the CKD unit category is not fair, the company’s counsel Arvind Datar had argued.
Additional Solicitor General N Venkatraman, appearing for the Customs, said the department concluded after a thorough investigation that the company has to pay tax as per the CKD category.
On Wednesday, the bench clarified that it would, at this stage, only decide the issue on the point of limitation.
“On the issue of limitation, please file an affidavit. Though we have heard extensively on all issues, as of now we are only deciding on the issue of limitation because that goes to the root of the case,” the court said.
The department has to file its affidavit by March 10.
The German group, led in the country by Skoda Auto Volkswagen India, has been accused of deliberately misleading the Customs authorities through its mode of import of parts as individual units rather than a component of a CKD unit, which attracts higher import duty.
The CKD units attract a 30-35 per cent duty, but Volkswagen declared its imports as separate components in different shipments and paid only 5-15 per cent in duties, as per the Customs department.
According to the authorities, imports of various unassembled parts of cars should have been declared as CKD units. Instead, the automaker paid a duty of only 5 to 15 per cent by choosing to declare its imports as individual components arriving in separate shipments. PTI SP NR
Limitation on tax demands: Customs ordered to justify timeliness of reclassification-based demand alleging misclassification against automaker. Limitation on tax demands is central: Customs issued a show-cause notice seeking reassessment on the basis that imports declared as individual parts should have been classified as Completely Knocked Down (CKD) units, attracting higher duty. The company claims the notice is arbitrary and time-barred after decades of payments under the parts classification. The court confined its current consideration to the limitation issue and directed Customs to file an affidavit explaining why the notice is not barred by limitation, with a specified filing deadline.Press 'Enter' after typing page number.