Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
In a recent judgment, CESTAT has allowed refund of amount paid on services which were not subject to tax before a particular date.
Facts of the Case:
Department has alleged that the assessee is engaged in providing "Consulting Engineer Service" and asked the assessee to deposit service tax on the same. Assessee has deposited service tax under protest. Later on a new category of service namely "scientific and technical services". The services of assessee was being covered under the new category. Therefore, assessee has filed a refund claim. Commissioner (A) has granted the refund claim.
Decision:
CESTAT has uphold the decision of commissioner (A) and allowed refund.
For full text of judgment - visit 2008 -TMI - 2791 - CESTAT, MUMBAI)
Refundability of tax paid under protest when a service is later reclassified as taxable considered in administrative review. The issue concerns whether amounts paid under protest in response to a departmental demand for a service not taxable at the time are refundable when that service is later encompassed by a newly notified taxable service category; the analysis focuses on classification change, preservation of contestation by deposit under protest, and administrative review of the refund claim.Press 'Enter' after typing page number.