Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
There is no definition of the term “Shell Company” in the Companies Act. It normally refers to a company without active business operation or significant assets, which in some cases are used for illegal purpose such as tax evasion, money laundering, obscuring ownership, benami properties etc. This was stated by Union Minister of State for Corporate Affairs Shri Rao Inderjit Singh in a written reply to a question in Rajya Sabha today.
On the identification shell companies, the Minister stated that the Special Task Force set up by the Government to look into the issue of “Shell Companies” has inter-alia recommended the use of certain red flag indicators as alerts for identification of Shell Companies.
Giving more details, the Minister stated that the Government has undertaken a Special Drive for identification and strike off of Companies by invoking the provisions of section 248 (1) of the Act by which the Registrar of Companies (RoC) struck off those companies after following the due process of law from the Register of companies when RoC has reasonable cause to believe that those companies are not carrying on any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the status of a dormant company under section 455.
The Minister listed the total number of companies struck off u/s 248 State/Union Territory-wise as under:
Sate/ UT-wise | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 |
Gujarat | 6398 | 2494 | 257 |
Andaman | 24 | 15 | 2 |
Karnataka | 4171 | 5568 | 1038 |
UT of Chandigarh | 3514 | 893 | 501 |
Tamil Nadu and Coimbatore | 9107 | 3214 | 1322 |
Orissa | 2907 | 719 | 78 |
NCT of Delhi and Haryana | 30544 | 12653 | 2396 |
Kerala | 2801 | 5339 | 977 |
Goa | 250 | 311 | 36 |
Madhya Pradesh | 3386 | 1168 | 111 |
Himachal Pradesh | 481 | 176 | 201 |
Telangana | 16364 | 2686 | 730 |
Rajasthan | 4038 | 4466 | 507 |
Jammu and Kashmir | 255 | 138 | 0 |
Jharkhand | 1306 | 403 | 139 |
Uttar Pradesh | 7589 | 5821 | 1936 |
West Bengal | 8390 | 6627 | 5 |
Maharashtra (Mumbai and Pune) | 47575 | 7824 | 2298 |
Bihar | 2540 | 1956 | 185 |
UT of Puducherry | 37 | 117 | 35 |
Assam, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Manipur, and Sikkim | 372 | 796 | 88 |
Uttarakhand | 476 | 79 | 0 |
Andhra Pradesh | 3864 | 958 | 0 |
Chhattisgarh | 539 | 347 | 47 |
Grand Total | 156928 | 64768 | 12889 |
Strike-off of inactive companies under section 248 guided by red flag identification and a special drive leading to removals. Strike-off of companies for prolonged non operation has been effected by the Registrar of Companies by invoking Section 248(1) where the RoC believes a company has not carried on business for the two immediately preceding financial years and has not applied for dormant status under Section 455; a Special Drive applied this mechanism and the Ministry reported 12,889 companies struck off in 2020-21.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.