The issue

A limited notice was issued to the effect as to whether the appellant - Kerala State Electricity Board, the service recipient, within the meaning of provisions of Finance Act, 1994, levying service tax, is liable to pay any interest on the amount of tax due to the respondent.

The appellant urged that the liability to pay interest and penalty being statutory one, the service provider was responsible therefor and not the service recipient.

Findings and decision of High Court

Despite the said contractual commitments, the appellant failed and/or neglected to pay service tax on behalf of foreign company.  It, on the other hand, raised a dispute that having regard to the purported statutory obligations of the service provider as contained in the Act and the Rules framed, it was not liable to pay any service tax.

By reason of the impugned judgment, the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court construing the provisions of the Act in the light of the terms of the contract entered into by and between the appellant and the foreign company opined that the liability in that regard was on the appellant and not on the foreign company. 

Decision

Honorable Supreme Court has upheld the decision of high court. According the recipient of services shall be liable to pay interest on late payment of service tax. 

(For full text of judgment - visit - 2007 -TMI - 2362 - Supreme Court of India)

Recipient of services liability affirmed: recipient must pay interest for late service tax payment under assumed tax obligations. The courts construed the Finance Act, 1994 and contractual terms and concluded that where a service recipient has undertaken to discharge service tax but fails to remit it, the recipient of services is liable to pay interest on late payment of service tax and attendant penalties as applicable.