Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 News - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Category: ?
Categorized by AI
---- All Categories ----
  • ---- All Categories ----
  • Income Tax
  • GST
  • Customs, DGFT & SEZ
  • FEMA & RBI
  • Corp. Laws, SEBI & IBC
  • PMLA, Black Money & ED
  • Budget
  • News and Press Release
  • PTI News
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      News
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      News

      Back

      All News

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        News

        Back

        All News

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        Supreme Court Dismisses the Appeal filed by Smt. Rasila S. Mehta and Smt. Rina S. Mehta against the order of a Special Court and upheld the Notifications by the Custodian for their (Mehtas) Involvement in the Securities Scam of 1992

        May 12, 2011

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Press Information Bureau

        Government of India

        Ministry of Finance

        12-May-2011

        The Supreme Court, by an order dated 6th May 2011, upheld the notifications by the Custodian regarding involvement of Smt. Rasila S. Mehta and Smt. Rina S. Mehta in the securities scam of 1992. They are, respectively, the mother and sister-in-law of late Harshad Mehta. The Apex court dismissed their appeals against the order of the Special Court, which had confirmed their January 2007 notifications by the Custodian. With this order of the Supreme Court, another round of distribution to the banks and financial institutions, who are the creditors of the Harshad Mehta Group, to the extent of an amount between Rs.800 to 1000 crores, has become a distinct possibility. The assets likely to be liquidated by the Custodian and made available for distribution comprise of shares and immovable properties, apart from cash and fixed deposits. It may be recalled that Satish Loomba, Custodian (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities), Ministry of Finance, had distributed an amount of Rs.2200 crores approximately in March this year, to the Income Tax authorities and the State Bank of India.

        The path breaking judgment of the Supreme Court, delivered by a bench comprising of Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice B.S. Chauhan, laid down clear judicial precepts in ruling that the notifications carried out by the Custodian, which came several years after the securities scam, without any pre-decisional hearing, were not violative of the principles of natural justice. The court further said that in construing a statute of this nature, the courts should not adhere to a literal meaning but construe the same, keeping in view the larger public interest. While accepting the arguments of the Custodian, the court ruled that he was justified in relying on the reports of the Janakiraman Committee, Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), the Inter-disciplinary Group (IDG) and the reports of Chartered Accountants and other experts. The Custodian had argued that the income of these ladies had risen from near nil levels to tens and hundreds of crores of rupees in a short period without any asset base, through transactions involving huge amounts of money sourced from Harshad Mehta. With this additional amount, nearly all the principal liabilities of the Harshad Mehta Group towards taxes, banks and financial institutions are expected to be met.

        DSM/BY/GN
        (Release ID :72108)


        Natural justice and custodian notifications upheld, allowing administrative reliance on investigative reports to enable asset recovery and distribution. The Custodian's post-event notifications identifying beneficiaries of proceeds from the 1992 securities fraud were upheld as not violating principles of natural justice, because the Custodian reasonably relied on committee reports, parliamentary and interdisciplinary inquiries, and expert accounting analyses; courts should adopt a purposive construction favouring public interest, permitting administrative seizure and liquidation of assets to enable distribution to creditors.
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                                Natural justice and custodian notifications upheld, allowing administrative reliance on investigative reports to enable asset recovery and distribution.

                                The Custodian's post-event notifications identifying beneficiaries of proceeds from the 1992 securities fraud were upheld as not violating principles of natural justice, because the Custodian reasonably relied on committee reports, parliamentary and interdisciplinary inquiries, and expert accounting analyses; courts should adopt a purposive construction favouring public interest, permitting administrative seizure and liquidation of assets to enable distribution to creditors.





                                Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                                Topics

                                ActsIncome Tax
                                No Records Found