1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Constitutional mandate requires GST implementation; failure causes loss of tax-levying entitlement and a potential fiscal gap.</h1> The constitutional amendment mandates GST implementation by the specified deadline, making deferral legally impermissible because failure to enact GST would terminate the government's entitlement to collect existing indirect taxes. The GST Council, acting by consensus, has set implementation rules and tax-rate brackets, while state legislatures are required to pass SGST bills; non-joining states risk double taxation and competitive disadvantages. The Council remains open to rate adjustments and expects operational issues to be resolved over time.