Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
In Bata India Limited reported in 2007 -TMI - 1611 - CESTAT,KOLKATA an interesting issued came before the honorable tribunal (CESTAT) that where price has been indicated as "Cum-Duty-Price" and cleared as exempted goods, whether the provisions of Section 11D are applicable where the assessee is required to deposit the amount if collected in the name of Central Excise Duty.
In the instant case, CESTAT has held that mere filing such price-list alone is not enough to attract the provision of Section l1D. We have seen some of the invoices which merely record the value of the goods and discount and a sales tax on the discounted value. No amount is collected through these invoices representing excise duty on these exempted goods. Therefore, the provision of Section l1D is not applicable to the facts of this case.
Cum-duty-price notation does not alone establish excise collection; actual identifiable duty receipt is required to impose deposit obligations. Notation of 'cum-duty-price' on invoices or price-lists for exempted goods does not, by itself, trigger a deposit obligation for excise; the decisive factor is whether an identifiable amount was actually collected from the purchaser as excise. Documents that only state a gross price, discounts, and sales tax on discounted value, without any separate excise component collected, do not establish collection of duty and therefore do not meet the factual threshold for treating receipts as collected excise.Press 'Enter' after typing page number.