Where assessee settles TDS liability as deductor of TDS under Vivad se Vishwas (i.e against order u/s 201), when will he get consequential relief of expenditure allowance under proviso to section 40(a)(i)/(ia)?
FAQs on Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Consequential relief under section 40 proviso: settled section 201 TDS liability excludes related disallowance from disputed tax. A deductor who settles TDS liability under Vivad se Vishwas in respect of an order under section 201 is entitled to consequential allowance under the proviso to section 40(a)(i)/(ia) in the year the tax was required to be deducted; any section 40 disallowance consequent on the settled section 201 order is ignored in computing disputed tax. If the Department has not challenged a merits decision favouring the assessee on section 201, related section 40 disallowance is similarly ignored. Refunds arising from such settlement do not attract interest under section 244A, and higher settlement amounts apply in search cases.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Consequential relief under section 40 proviso: settled section 201 TDS liability excludes related disallowance from disputed tax.
A deductor who settles TDS liability under Vivad se Vishwas in respect of an order under section 201 is entitled to consequential allowance under the proviso to section 40(a)(i)/(ia) in the year the tax was required to be deducted; any section 40 disallowance consequent on the settled section 201 order is ignored in computing disputed tax. If the Department has not challenged a merits decision favouring the assessee on section 201, related section 40 disallowance is similarly ignored. Refunds arising from such settlement do not attract interest under section 244A, and higher settlement amounts apply in search cases.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.