1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Section 29A IBC: Who Cannot Bid for Resolution Plans and How Strict Ineligibility Rules Are Enforced</h1> Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code disqualifies certain persons from being resolution applicants, including undischarged insolvents, wilful defaulters, NPA holders (subject to cure), those convicted of specified offences, disqualified directors, SEBI-debarred entities, persons involved in certain avoidable transactions, defaulting guarantors, persons with similar foreign disabilities, and their connected persons. Financial entities have limited exemptions, especially where related-party status arises solely from debt-to-equity conversions. Courts have upheld the constitutional validity and broad, 'see-through' application of Section 29A, extended its rationale to liquidation and schemes of compromise, restricted promoters' re-entry where ineligible, clarified that Section 29A does not confer moratorium immunity, and interpreted 'control' as de facto positive control over management or policy decisions.