Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Faceless assessment procedure requires that any draft assessment proposing variation prejudicial to the taxpayer be examined and the taxpayer be given an opportunity to show cause before finalisation; failure to communicate such draft and to afford show cause opportunity is a breach of the mandatory procedure. Because the Revenue conceded no draft was communicated and no opportunity was given, the final assessment under section 143(3) and consequent demand notice were quashed for non compliance with the faceless assessment requirements, and the petition disposed of with no order as to costs.
Faceless assessment procedure requires that any draft assessment proposing variation prejudicial to the taxpayer be examined and the taxpayer be given an opportunity to show cause before finalisation; failure to communicate such draft and to afford show cause opportunity is a breach of the mandatory procedure. Because the Revenue conceded no draft was communicated and no opportunity was given, the final assessment under section 143(3) and consequent demand notice were quashed for non compliance with the faceless assessment requirements, and the petition disposed of with no order as to costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.