Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Leased premises used as a hotel, though containing a restaurant, banquet and conference halls, bar and health club, qualify as a building used for accommodation and thus fall within the renting of immovable property exclusion; the Tribunal found those facilities to be integral or incidental to hotel activity rather than separate commercial deployments and held that Explanation 2 deeming partial business use is not attracted. Applying the plain-text exclusion and following prior coordinate-bench reasoning affirmed by higher authority, the impugned demand and orders were set aside with consequential relief.
Leased premises used as a hotel, though containing a restaurant, banquet and conference halls, bar and health club, qualify as a building used for accommodation and thus fall within the renting of immovable property exclusion; the Tribunal found those facilities to be integral or incidental to hotel activity rather than separate commercial deployments and held that Explanation 2 deeming partial business use is not attracted. Applying the plain-text exclusion and following prior coordinate-bench reasoning affirmed by higher authority, the impugned demand and orders were set aside with consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
