Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of In prosecutions for cheque dishonour under s.138 NI Act, the Court held that transfer of proceedings under s.446 BNSS should be assessed primarily on comparative convenience and hardship to the parties and witnesses, since the offence is quasi-criminal, essentially individual-centric and compoundable, and does not implicate broader societal interests. Where the complainant bank sought to create territorial jurisdiction by presenting cheques at a distant branch, that convenience could not outweigh undue prejudice to the accused, especially given the bank's nationwide presence, the transaction and witnesses being centered elsewhere, and related proceedings pending before DRT/HC. The cases were directed to be tried at Hyderabad (CMM) and the issue was referred for consideration by a larger bench. - SC
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
