1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The dominant issue was whether certain data projectors were classifiable under tariff item 85286200 as projectors capable of directly connecting to, and designed for use with, an automatic data processing (ADP) system, despite having additional HDMI and USB ports. Relying on the technical literature, the product design and connectors compatible with PCs, and applying GIR 1 with the Explanatory Notes to heading 8528, it was held that the presence of additional ports does not alter the essential design and principal use with ADP machines; accordingly, the goods were classified under 85286200. On the linked issue of exemption, since the goods are principally used in an ADP system of heading 8471 and fall under the specified subheadings, the benefit under Serial No. 17 of Notification No. 24/2005-Cus. was allowed - AAR