Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
HC entertained a challenge to a composite demand-cum-show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 covering multiple tax periods. Observing that a coordinate bench had earlier granted a reasoned interim order in similar matters, and that no contrary view had been taken by any other bench, the HC applied the rule of consistency and noted that three other HCs had decided the issue in favour of assessees. Finding a prima facie case, the HC granted interim protection in the present and connected petitions where no interim relief had yet been granted. Application disposed.
HC entertained a challenge to a composite demand-cum-show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 covering multiple tax periods. Observing that a coordinate bench had earlier granted a reasoned interim order in similar matters, and that no contrary view had been taken by any other bench, the HC applied the rule of consistency and noted that three other HCs had decided the issue in favour of assessees. Finding a prima facie case, the HC granted interim protection in the present and connected petitions where no interim relief had yet been granted. Application disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
