1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Highlights
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee-company, deleting the TP adjustment on royalty payment. It held that the royalty transaction was closely linked to the manufacturing segment, which had already been benchmarked under TNMM, and the assessee's operating margin of 4.19% had been accepted at arm's length by the TPO pursuant to DRP directions. Once the combined TNMM benchmarking, whose PLI includes royalty, is accepted as arm's length, a separate adjustment on royalty under a different method is impermissible. Following HC precedent, ITAT ruled that isolating one element for distinct benchmarking would distort the ALP determination.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
