TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of HC upheld the impugned show cause notice and provisional attachment issued under s.24 of the Benami Act against A and related entities, holding that the Initiating Officer (IO) is only required to have 'reason to believe' based on some material in his possession, a standard higher than under BNS/BNSS but lower than a prima facie case. HC declined to examine in writ jurisdiction whether the transactions fit the definition of 'benami transaction' under s.2(9), as this falls within the domain of the Adjudicating Authority. HC held that prior written approval of the Approving Authority under s.24(3) need not be supplied with the attachment order, though it must be provided on request. Liberty was reserved to A to seek relief before the Adjudicating Authority. The writ petition was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
