PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC, exercising jurisdiction under PMLA, upheld the legality of the petitioner's arrest under s.19, noting proper recording and communication of "reasons to believe" and service of written grounds of arrest, duly acknowledged by the petitioner. On culpability, HC found prima facie material in the prosecution complaint and statements recorded under s.50 indicating that the petitioner directly participated in money laundering activities involving use, acquisition, possession, concealment and projection of proceeds of crime as untainted. Applying ss.19, 45(1) and 45(2), HC held the stringent twin conditions for bail were not satisfied, given the gravity of the economic offence, sophisticated modus operandi, and substantial loss to the exchequer. Finding no exceptional circumstances, HC dismissed the bail application.
HC, exercising jurisdiction under PMLA, upheld the legality of the petitioner's arrest under s.19, noting proper recording and communication of "reasons to believe" and service of written grounds of arrest, duly acknowledged by the petitioner. On culpability, HC found prima facie material in the prosecution complaint and statements recorded under s.50 indicating that the petitioner directly participated in money laundering activities involving use, acquisition, possession, concealment and projection of proceeds of crime as untainted. Applying ss.19, 45(1) and 45(2), HC held the stringent twin conditions for bail were not satisfied, given the gravity of the economic offence, sophisticated modus operandi, and substantial loss to the exchequer. Finding no exceptional circumstances, HC dismissed the bail application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
