Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
CESTAT upheld the order of the Commr (Appeals) setting aside the late filing charges imposed on the importer. The respondent had filed four advance Bills of Entry on 01.12.2021 which did not appear in the ICEGATE system due to a systemic error; CESTAT held the respondent could not be held liable for consequences arising from such technical failure. It was further noted that any alleged delay occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, for which the limitation period stood excluded, and therefore could not be attributed to the respondent. CESTAT found no infirmity in the absence of a speaking order under S.17(5) of the Customs Act or in the reasoning of the Commr (Appeals). The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.