Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding NCLT's rejection of CA No. 121/2022. It held that the NCLT order dated 18.07.2019, by which the appellant was impleaded in proceedings under ss. 241-242 based on an SFIO report, had merged into the appellate order passed by NCLAT in Company Appeal No. 215/2019, which was decided on merits. Consequently, the original NCLT order could not be invoked to seek review or recall before NCLT. The subsequent filing and withdrawal of an appeal before SC did not disturb the doctrine of merger or revive any right to challenge the NCLT order. Reliance on prior SC remand orders in similar impleadment matters was rejected, as those contentions had already been raised before SC when the appellant withdrew its appeal.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding NCLT's rejection of CA No. 121/2022. It held that the NCLT order dated 18.07.2019, by which the appellant was impleaded in proceedings under ss. 241-242 based on an SFIO report, had merged into the appellate order passed by NCLAT in Company Appeal No. 215/2019, which was decided on merits. Consequently, the original NCLT order could not be invoked to seek review or recall before NCLT. The subsequent filing and withdrawal of an appeal before SC did not disturb the doctrine of merger or revive any right to challenge the NCLT order. Reliance on prior SC remand orders in similar impleadment matters was rejected, as those contentions had already been raised before SC when the appellant withdrew its appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
